Joined
·
76 Posts
See, let me tell you the very first thing that created "lag" was the throttle "cable."
Did you know in the early days a steel rod linked the gas pedal to the carburetor's butterfly valve, when a driver stepped on it the message to the engine was truly as instant as one can get.
When that valve opened up the engine sucked AIR and that air rushed past jets in effect sucking FUEL in with it!
Then came cables, and these are not as responsive as rods because rods are stiff.
Nowadays we have sensors on the gas pedal that detect when the foot steps on it, send a message to the ECU, the ECU in turn sends a command to the motor inside the throttle body that opens the butterfly valve AND to the fuel injectors to start delivering fuel to the cylinders. One would think electronics are the fastest in delivering the message but have you ever watched this in real life? That butterfly valve opens quickly, but even at top speed the gears can't turn the valve as fast as my foot can mash the pedal to the floorboard. In fact, even at top speed that valve opens some kind of gradually.
The steel rod could deliver the message, if I mashed the pedal to the floor in an instant that rod opened the valve just as quickly.
Carbureted engines always were quicker right off the start, even to this day.
But the older cars also suffered from this throttle lag for different reasons, most of it to do with slack and looseness.
If a U-joint has even a thousandths of an inch of play in it that will create a split second of lag and that is only one piece that must function to deliver power along the way from the gas pedal to the wheels. U-joint, CV joints, all the same thing for the sake of this argument.
It's funny...
Like if you're planning on racing someone else, you actually have to PLAN on hitting that gas pedal ahead of the actual event of accelerating because if you hesitate you will lose.
Throttle lag, the bigger the engine, the more lag the driver will experience and thus the farther ahead of actual acceleration the driver must plan on hitting the gas.
Did you know in the early days a steel rod linked the gas pedal to the carburetor's butterfly valve, when a driver stepped on it the message to the engine was truly as instant as one can get.
When that valve opened up the engine sucked AIR and that air rushed past jets in effect sucking FUEL in with it!
Then came cables, and these are not as responsive as rods because rods are stiff.
Nowadays we have sensors on the gas pedal that detect when the foot steps on it, send a message to the ECU, the ECU in turn sends a command to the motor inside the throttle body that opens the butterfly valve AND to the fuel injectors to start delivering fuel to the cylinders. One would think electronics are the fastest in delivering the message but have you ever watched this in real life? That butterfly valve opens quickly, but even at top speed the gears can't turn the valve as fast as my foot can mash the pedal to the floorboard. In fact, even at top speed that valve opens some kind of gradually.
The steel rod could deliver the message, if I mashed the pedal to the floor in an instant that rod opened the valve just as quickly.
Carbureted engines always were quicker right off the start, even to this day.
But the older cars also suffered from this throttle lag for different reasons, most of it to do with slack and looseness.
If a U-joint has even a thousandths of an inch of play in it that will create a split second of lag and that is only one piece that must function to deliver power along the way from the gas pedal to the wheels. U-joint, CV joints, all the same thing for the sake of this argument.
It's funny...
Like if you're planning on racing someone else, you actually have to PLAN on hitting that gas pedal ahead of the actual event of accelerating because if you hesitate you will lose.
Throttle lag, the bigger the engine, the more lag the driver will experience and thus the farther ahead of actual acceleration the driver must plan on hitting the gas.