| Visit The Chevy Impala Store at California Impala for deals on rust free Californian Impalas and B-Body vehicles. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Garage | Register | FAQ | Members List | Link To Us | Latest CL Impala Listings | Active Topics | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern Kentucky!
Posts: 23
|
Winter's coming... snow tires and such
Howdy, all -
In preparation for the coming colder months, I had a check-up done on the wagon - oil change and such. My mechanic mentioned having studded snow tires places on the rear wheels, within the next month or so. As well, he recommended placing a bag of sand in the wagon's rear, so as to help weigh down a little on the RWD, which can add a little more grip, on slick roads. The latter bit of advice is new to me, and I wanted to run it by you folks beforehand - I like my mechanic, and he does pretty well by my wagon (he's something of a fan of these vehicles), but figures I'd drop by to see what you all think. As well, if you all have any other winter advice for me, I'd love to hear it. Thanks!
__________________
"Man... this wagon is a beast." - my brother |
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
|
If you do not keep much weight in the back of your car then yes put the bag of sand back there. Extra weight will help keep the rear wheels gripping and not just spinning on solid ice and heavy snow. The idea is to keep the back of your car where it belongs, behind you, though the method of extra weight is not full proof it will help alot.
__________________
1977 Impala Sedan, 5.0L, TH200R, 3.25:1, 74K miles, 26 Lifetime Warranty Parts. 1997 Dodge Ram B2500, 5.2L, 36RH, 3.21:1, 335K miles, 6 Lifetime Warranty Parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 24
|
For years, I ran studded snow tires on the rear. Then someone/something convinced me to give "ice" tires a try on all four corners. I have been extremely pleased with the results. Whereas the studded snow tires were great for getting me moving, the "ice" tires do that too but also give me better stopping and maneuvering. I run Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice on two cars and a discontinued Bridgestone Blizzak on another car. I would run Goodyears on all three but the Goodyears don't come in the size the wife's Accord uses.
The downside to the "ice" tires is the special compound that allows them to grip the ice is normally only found in the top layers of the tread. Off the top of my head, the Goodyears come with a 13/32" tread. The first 7/32" has the special silica compound that grips ice. The last 6/32" doesn't so you basically have a regular snow tire. Then again, if you are down to 6/32", you don't have much of a snow tire since there isn't much tread left to "bite" the snow so you really should be getting new tires anyway. In my experience the downside to studded tires were: (1) having to watch the calendar to make sure when you were allowed to have them on the car, (2) having the studs put in by someone who was clueless, (3) broken studs and (4) extra noise.
__________________
'96 Impala SS |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 50
|
Ideally, the extra weight should be added directly over the rear axle. If you get those 70 lbs sand tubes it is easier to place them. I typically use two of them.
- If you have a wagon and tend to leave the seats up, then it should be between the second and third seats. I usually leave my seats flat,so I put them in the third seat footwell. I can feel the difference in handling; the wagon is a little bit more tail-happy in corners. The difference in traction is well worth it though. - In a sedan, puit it as forward in the trunk as possible. IIRC in my 9C1 sedan, I used to put them under the package shelf and use the spare tire to hold them there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 16
|
Uh..... I'll have to disagree. You want to put the extra weight as far to the rear as you can. By putting the weight as far to the rear you are actually levering it. Hold a 20 pound weight close to your body. Not so hard. Now hold it as far away as you can. Pretty tough.
Instead of sand, I would suggest bags of salt. Once the season is over, you can throw the darn things into your water softener. Sand just sits in the garage waiting til next year - taking up space. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
|
Quote:
On the salt bags, as long as your trunk stays nice and dry then good. If any moisture gets in the trunk then it will cause the salt to eat at the metal from the inside, not good.
__________________
1977 Impala Sedan, 5.0L, TH200R, 3.25:1, 74K miles, 26 Lifetime Warranty Parts. 1997 Dodge Ram B2500, 5.2L, 36RH, 3.21:1, 335K miles, 6 Lifetime Warranty Parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator/Executioner
|
Quote:
Not everyone is gifted with common sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
I've been driving for 35 years with bags of salt in the back of my various trucks and RWD cars. AND I have never ever broken one. Nor did the salt eat the box or trunk. I've never heard of any car or truck flipping because of a couple bags of salt in the back. ( The OP was asking about HIS car NOT a hypothetical Extra Long Church Van) Under inflated tires - maybe . Stupid drivers driving Extra Long Church Vans with high centres of gravity doing stupid things - maybe. But come on. We're talking the weight of ONE small child here! If you godda make a sudden lane change.... and it takes the weight of one small child to make your car dangerous !!! ... then yup .... I'll agree - were all not blessed with common sense ![]() Last edited by Couperdecar : 12-21-2008 at 09:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 50
|
I've done it both ways (weight over the axle and weight as far back as possible). I can't say that I really noticed any difference in traction, but when the weight was at the rear I did notice a difference in handling or more specifically the tendency of the rear of the car to want to slide out in turns. In most situations this does not happen, but you can feel the difference. This was most pronounced in wagons over sedans (prossibly either because of the lack of a rear sway bar in most of my wagons or the third seat footwell is place where you can put a lot of weight right at the rear of the car).
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Snow Tires 225 60 R16 from 2004 Chevy Impala (South Hill Puyallup) $300 | ImpalaParts | CL Seattle-Tacoma | 0 | 10-18-2008 03:47 AM |
| ===snow wheels (all 4) 16" 5 on 114 2002 Impala (scappoose) $100 | ImpalaParts | CL Portland, OR | 0 | 10-03-2008 10:13 AM |
| Snow+boredom+4WD = broken exhaust and crappy pics! | HAZZARDJOHN | Off-Topic Discussion | 12 | 04-28-2008 06:58 PM |
| can i put a hydrolic snow plow pump under the hood of my 94 chevy k1500 pick-up w/ | Big Red | General Automotive Discussion | 4 | 09-12-2007 07:03 AM |
| Are they coming out with a 2007 Trans Am? | flinda | General Automotive Discussion | 0 | 09-09-2007 05:58 PM |